Discogs seller tried selling this as a 1st press from 1997 for $100

Some records are difficult to identify as a first press so I understand if a seller makes a mistake, though honestly they should be taking the time to do proper research when they’re selling it in the 3-figure range. I’ve had to return a handful of records on discogs now for that reason. They have always been nice about it, this one was no exception but whatta heck man?! There’s an mp3 promo sticker when labels started including a download code around the late 00s. I understand if they incorrectly read the matrix runout or missed another tiny detail but how does one ignore a sticker that places this pressing 10 years after the initial run. I’ve never left negative feedback over this but am considering it given the lack of awareness going on here.