Hillary Clinton did not lose because she was a "bad candidate", and no, she was not "extremely corrupt". She lost because of propaganda and smear campaigns.

I just finished reading the wikipedia article on her experience as secretary of state (below) and came to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton has been swiftboated in one of the most successful smear campaigns in history...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton%27s_tenure_as_Secretary_of_State#2012

Read it. All of that work she did was reduced to 2 words; "Emails" and "Benghazi"--- 2 nothing burgers that were blown way out of proportion to discredit her; Kevin Mccarthy literally admitted that the whole Benghazi thing was just to discredit Hillary, and James Comey said that while she was careless with her emails, there was no evidence of intentional wrongdoing ( I can debate these 2 topics more in the comments ).

There's a reason why her approval rating halved when she announced her run for president-That's when the right-wing propaganda machine started. Now, you have some people thinking she's the literal devil on earth.

Those saying she "should've just campaigned in Michigan" are ignoring the obvious interference that happened in her campaign. Comey's bogus letter literally cut her lead by half and Bernie-Bros are talking about her campaigning like it mattered. She campaigned in Pensylvania the most out of any state, and still lost.

Saying she "was just unpopular" when she nearly beat one of the best candidates in history (Obama) and beat sanders by 4M votes (no, she did not "steal" the primary, but I can debate that in the comments), is also very disingenous.

Now obviously, this isn't to say she's a perfect person, but unless you want to dive into conspiracy theories, (like how she's apparently a serial killer lmao?) then I think this opinion is fair