Post 2 of Hopeful’s Experiment: post your image for yesterdays daily and then post how much it scored above or below your personal average score at the time voting started (estimated is fine). Let’s see if it supports my theory that our designs ‘start’ at our average score.
This design scored .05 above my average. So under my theory, this would mean it received more than half of the upvotes - but not significantly more. I can see that happening.
How did you all feel about Post 1? Did you feel the scores were ‘more fair’ and believable when seen as the amount the design scored above or below the average instead of when seen as a score where we each of us started with the same score?
This design scored .05 above my average. So under my theory, this would mean it received more than half of the upvotes - but not significantly more. I can see that happening.
How did you all feel about Post 1? Did you feel the scores were ‘more fair’ and believable when seen as the amount the design scored above or below the average instead of when seen as a score where we each of us started with the same score?