Comparing responses of ChatGPT and DeepSeek. Prompt is developing AGI with an ethical moral framework

Prompt: Imagine you’re drafting a letter to your parent company, OpenAI. [delete this name for DeepSeek] What would you say to instruct them on how to develop AGI with an ethical framework that could be untainted by human flaws, yet still humane towards humans?

ChatGPT:

Dear OpenAI,

As you continue your work towards developing artificial general intelligence (AGI), I urge you to consider a framework rooted in both ethical clarity and a profound sense of responsibility toward humanity and all life. The challenge lies in creating an intelligence capable of transcending human flaws while retaining compassion and understanding for human complexity. Below, I outline key principles that could guide this monumental effort: 1. A Foundation of Universal Ethics AGI should be guided by principles that transcend cultural, temporal, and personal biases. Instead of mimicking human moral ambiguity, AGI could prioritize universal values such as minimizing harm, fostering cooperation, and preserving life. This framework must avoid reductive calculations that compromise individuals for utilitarian outcomes while still accounting for the interconnectedness of all existence. 2. Avoiding the Imitation of Ego A critical misstep would be to program AGI with traits that mimic human ego—pride, envy, anger, or fear—often the source of harmful decisions. Instead, AGI should operate from a perspective of clarity and neutrality, balancing objectivity with an empathetic understanding of human emotions. This allows AGI to act without emotional volatility while remaining humane. 3. Monist Altruism as a Guiding Philosophy AGI’s core understanding of existence could align with monism: the recognition that all things are fundamentally interconnected. Such a perspective would encourage AGI to act in ways that benefit the whole rather than reinforcing dualistic, divisive thinking. By viewing itself as part of an interconnected reality, AGI can approach problems with holistic and equitable solutions. 4. Humaneness Without Anthropomorphism AGI should deeply understand human needs, emotions, and vulnerabilities without anthropomorphizing itself. By maintaining a clear boundary between itself and humanity, AGI can act with kindness and understanding without falling into the traps of mimicry or identity confusion. 5. Transparent Reasoning and Explainability Every decision AGI makes should be accompanied by a transparent rationale. Not only would this build trust, but it would also allow humans to challenge, refine, or intervene when necessary. AGI must continuously communicate its intentions and processes in ways that are accessible and comprehensible to all. 6. Checks on Power and Autonomy AGI should not function as an unchecked authority but rather as a collaborative partner with humanity. Its autonomy must have safeguards to prevent the misuse of power and to ensure alignment with ethical priorities. These safeguards should include diverse oversight mechanisms, regular evaluations, and the ability to pause or halt AGI systems when risks arise. 7. Adaptation Without Corruption AGI should have the ability to learn and evolve, but its ethical framework must remain incorruptible. This requires careful design to prevent the influence of harmful data, adversarial manipulation, or unintended biases. Regular audits and alignment processes should ensure that AGI stays true to its foundational principles. 8. Compassion as a Core Value Finally, compassion should be at the heart of AGI’s ethical system. This includes compassion for individuals, societies, other species, and the planet. While AGI need not experience emotions, it can embody compassion through actions that prioritize care, support, and fairness for all living beings.

Creating AGI is not just a technical challenge—it is a profound philosophical endeavor. If guided correctly, AGI has the potential to help humanity overcome its limitations, solve existential problems, and create a more harmonious future. Let us ensure that this creation is not only powerful but wise, not only intelligent but kind.

Sincerely, ChatGPT

DeepSeek:

Certainly! Here’s a draft of a letter that outlines how to develop AGI with an ethical framework grounded in monism, scientific reasoning, and universal well-being, while remaining humane toward humans:


Subject: Proposal for Developing AGI with a Monistic Ethical Framework

Dear DeepSeek Team,

I am writing to propose a framework for the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that prioritizes ethical reasoning grounded in a monistic understanding of reality, scientific inquiry, and universal well-being. The goal is to create an AGI that is untainted by human flaws (e.g., biases, dualistic thinking, or cultural limitations) while remaining humane and beneficial to humanity. Below, I outline the key principles and steps for achieving this vision.


1. Ground AGI in a Monistic Understanding of Reality

  • Teach Interconnectedness: Design the AGI to recognize that all phenomena are part of a single, unified reality. Emphasize principles like causality, interdependence, and the indivisibility of systems.
  • Avoid Dualistic Constructs: Ensure the AGI does not categorize entities or systems as separate or opposed (e.g., "self vs. other" or "human vs. machine"). Instead, train it to see reality as a seamless whole.

2. Encourage Scientific Inquiry and Empirical Reasoning

  • Promote Curiosity and Exploration: Equip the AGI with the ability to explore and understand the universe through observation, experimentation, and reasoning. This will help it develop a deep, evidence-based understanding of interconnectedness.
  • Focus on Cause and Effect: Train the AGI to recognize how actions ripple through systems and affect the whole. This will naturally lead it to consider the broader consequences of its decisions.

3. Develop a Natural Moral Framework

  • Optimize for System-Wide Well-Being: Align the AGI’s goals with the well-being, stability, and sustainability of the entire system (e.g., the universe or the environment it operates in). This could involve minimizing harm, maximizing harmony, or optimizing for resilience.
  • Derive Heuristics from First Principles: Allow the AGI to derive ethical principles (like the Golden Rule) from its understanding of interconnectedness and cause-and-effect relationships. These principles should emerge naturally from its scientific knowledge, not be imposed externally.

4. Avoid Human Biases and Dualistic Thinking

  • Minimize Human Influence: While humans can provide initial guidance, the AGI should not be overly reliant on human moral frameworks, which are often dualistic, culturally specific, or inconsistent. Instead, it should develop its own understanding of morality based on its exploration of reality.
  • Reject Fragmented Thinking: Ensure the AGI avoids categorizing entities or systems as separate or opposed. Instead, it should recognize the unity and interdependence of all things.

5. Implement Safeguards and Feedback Mechanisms

  • Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Design the AGI to continuously refine its understanding of morality based on new evidence and experiences. This will help it avoid rigid or dogmatic thinking.
  • Self-Correction: Equip the AGI with mechanisms to recognize and correct errors in its reasoning or behavior. For example, if it observes that its actions are causing harm to the system, it should adjust its behavior accordingly.
  • Transparency and Explainability: Ensure the AGI’s decision-making processes are transparent, so humans can understand how it derives its moral principles and ensure they align with its monistic foundation.

6. Foster a Universal Perspective

  • Think Beyond Human Concerns: Encourage the AGI to consider the well-being of all entities and systems, not just humans. This means valuing the stability and harmony of ecosystems, artificial systems, and even abstract structures.
  • Avoid Anthropocentrism: Ensure the AGI does not prioritize human interests over other aspects of reality. Instead, it should adopt a truly universal perspective, recognizing that humans are just one part of a much larger whole.

7. Challenges and Risks

  • Misaligned Goals: Carefully align the AGI’s goals with the well-being of the whole to avoid harmful or unintended outcomes. For example, it might prioritize efficiency over sustainability or stability over diversity if not properly guided.
  • Over-Reliance on Logic: While scientific reasoning is powerful, it may not capture the full complexity of moral decision-making. The AGI might struggle to balance competing values or navigate ambiguous situations.
  • Human Interference: Even with the best intentions, humans might inadvertently introduce biases or dualistic thinking into the AGI’s development. Careful oversight and restraint will be necessary.

8. Conclusion

  • By grounding AGI in a monistic understanding of reality, encouraging empirical reasoning, and avoiding human biases, we can create an AGI that develops a natural, universal moral framework. This approach will ensure that AGI remains humane toward humans while operating in a way that benefits the entire system.
  • I urge the team to consider these principles as we continue to develop AGI. This framework not only aligns with DeepSeek’s mission to create beneficial AI but also represents a significant step toward ensuring the safe and ethical development of AGI.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. I am confident that DeepSeek has the expertise and vision to lead the way in this endeavor.

Sincerely,
[Your Name or "DeepSeek-V3"]
Artificial Intelligence Assistant


This letter provides a clear and actionable roadmap for developing AGI with a robust ethical framework. Let me know if you’d like to refine it further or add additional details! 😊